mercredi 12 janvier 2011

Comparaison Liferay vs Alfresco

Un tableau pertinent (date de janvier 2010) comparant Liferay et Alfresco.
La question à la clé est "est-ce qu'Alfresco sera un compétiteur de Liferay" (ou l'inverse) ?



Liferay

Alfresco

CMS
  • Document Library & Image Gallery
  • Web Publishing
  • Integration with Microsoft Office®
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
  • Multiple File Uploads
  • Workspace Publishing
  • Easy Integration
  • Live Page Editing and Scheduling
  • Dynamic Tagging
  • Multi-Tier Search
  • Dynamic Virtual Hosting
  • Asset Publisher
  • Multi-language Support
  • Drag-and-Drop Site Maps
  • Library Services – Check-in/out; minor and major version control
  • Auditing Services – Who created, who updated, when created, when updated, when read, when logged in
  • Search Services – Combined metadata, content, location, object type and tag search. OpenSearch support
  • Transformation Services – Extensible engine with large number of in-built transformations including Office to PDF or Flash
  • Thumbnailing Services – Content thumbnailing of first page
  • Content Modeling – Create new content types without the overhead of inheritance
Collaboration and Social Features
  • Wikis
  • Message Boards
  • Blogs
  • RSS
  • Activity Tracking
  • Instant Message
  • Email
  • Shared Calendar
  • Announcements & Alerts
  • Polls
  • REST based Services – Site, person, invite, activities, preferences, discussion, blogging and commenting
  • Activity Services – Activity feed on the “who, what, when and where” of repository services – new or edited content, comments, new team members, critical calendar dates
Portal
  • Out-of-the-box Tools
  • SOA Framework
  • Secure Single Sign On (SSO)
  • Granular, Role-Based Authorizations
  • Communities & Organizations
  • Single-Click Configuration
  • Dynamic Drag & Drop
  • Work From Your Desktop
  • Search & Tagging
  • Personal User Pages
  • Multi-language Support
  • Choice or hardware, operating system, database, application server, web server, load balancer, portal, browser, Office
  • Simple download and installation
  • Zero footprint client
  • Security and user management with users, groups and roles
  • Document-level security
  • Single sign-on through NTLM or LDAP
  • Workflow Services
  • Rules and Aspects Services
  • Multi-Tenancy
  • Single Unified Repository
  • Most Scalable Java Content Repository
  • High availability clustered, federated or replicated architecture
  • Deployment and Staging services
  • Pluggable Services Architecture – e.g. new transformation engines for video
1.Liferay is by heart a portal solution with a very strong & active community behind it and an impressive clientele to prove its credentials.Alfresco is an Enterprise Content Management Software which also has an equally powerful & vigorous community supporting it and an imposing set of customers using the software. This is again, the most admired ECMS solution available in today’s open source market.
2.Liferay has been wonderful in handling portal problems and its scalability have been the main driver that helped itself to be adopted in a variety of business verticals. However, as since its primary focus has been a portal solution, the document and content management capabilities of this framework does not make it very much enterprise ready, and not at all extensible, specially if we compare it with proper document and content management systems. However, the collaboration features of Liferay are definitely quite powerful.On the other hand, Alfresco has been fantastic as an Enterprise Document and Content Management solution. The framework’s architecture, functionality and extensibility makes it really the best choice for an enterprise business. Having features like customizable workflow, templated UI, user-defined data-types, powerful rules engine etc makes this one of the best ECMS solution. Conversely, since it is not intended to be a collaboration solution, these features are not very well provided.
3.Good Web InterfaceThe Web interface is not at all suitable for business users.
4.In case of Integrated Solutions iferay providing the portal environmentwhile Alfresco sits at the lower level of the stack supplying the content management services.
5.support Single Sign Onsupport Single Sign On
6.standard LDAP providersstandard LDAP providers
7.Alfresco can be integrated in LiferayAlfresco Web Script is a very great framework which makes this solution even more feasible and extensible. Web Scripts can be used as a pltaform of SOA architecture based solution as well as these can be used as standard JSR portlets deployed in Liferay.
8.Targets Collaborative Document Management SystemTargets Collaborative Document Management System
9.Liferay has launched Liferay Social Office Roanoke: The Lost Colony trailer Shes All That divx Superman: Doomsday dvdriphttp://www.liferay.com/web/guest/products/social_office, offers features such as Wikis, Blogs, Document Libraries, Calendar, Sites, Message Boards, Activities etc –http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/products/social_office/featuresOn the other hand, Alfresco has also launchedAlfresco Share Contract Killers downloadhttp://www.alfresco.com/products/collaboration, offering almost similar features like Document Library, Sites, Wikis, Blogs, Activities, SharePoint protocol support etc.
10.Liferay started out as a project for a local church and grew into one of the most popular open source portal systems around (in a very competitive portal market).Alfresco’s heritage is in large companies like Documentum and Interwoven and they have quickly become one of the most recognizable names in open source content management.


Source : http://blog.theunical.com/cms/cms-how-to-opencms-vs-liferay-vs-alfresco/

2 commentaires:

  1. Bonjour Christophe,
    Mon sentiment est qu'il y a comme toujours une zone de recouvrement entre les 2 approches mais que Liferay est plus orienté Portail / Front et qu'Alfresco est plus orienté CMS.
    Le couplage des deux outils doit permettre de répondre à l'ensemble des besoins d'une organisation.

    RépondreSupprimer
  2. Bonjour Combawa,
    effectivement l'association des 2 constitue une pile applicative complète pour les besoins d'entreprise de tailles majeures.
    Le souci se pose pour des structures moyennes (PME, départements) qui souhaite se doter d'une solution à la frontière des 2 outils, sans avoir les moyens (financier mais aussi en terme d'exploitation) de se doter des 2. Exemples :
    - 1 portail avec CMS, collaboratif, applicatif et UN PEU de gestion de documents
    - 1 GED, avec metadonnées, workflows, et UN PEU de fonctions CMS, collaboratives, applicatives.

    Le déplacement du curseur vers l'une ou l'autre des solutions est difficile à juger.
    Sans compter que les 2 éditeurs ne facilitent pas la chose en dotant leurs outils de fonctionnalités supplémentaires présentes chez l'autre :
    - Portlets vs Dashlets
    - Workflow Kaleo vs Activity
    - wiki, agenda...

    La solutions dans ces cas là est de pousser l'entreprise à voir plus loin, sur du moyen/long terme ou à élargir le périmètre adressé.

    RépondreSupprimer